-
Quantum steganography using catalytic and entanglement-assisted quantum codes
Authors:
Sanjoy Dutta,
Nihar Ranjan Dash,
Subhashish Banerjee,
R. Srikanth
Abstract:
Steganography is the technique for transmitting a secret message by employing subterfuge to conceal it in innocent-looking data, rather than by overt security measures as in cryptography. Typically, non-degenerate quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) are used as the cover medium, with the stego message disguised as noise. As in cryptography, a large number of bits or ebits are pre-shared, in thi…
▽ More
Steganography is the technique for transmitting a secret message by employing subterfuge to conceal it in innocent-looking data, rather than by overt security measures as in cryptography. Typically, non-degenerate quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) are used as the cover medium, with the stego message disguised as noise. As in cryptography, a large number of bits or ebits are pre-shared, in this case mainly in order to ensure the innocence effect. In this work we develop three steganographic protocols: first, a scheme based on catalytic quantum codes to minimize initial pre-shared resources; second, a scheme incorporating prior entanglement into QECCs in the form of possibly degenerate entanglement-assisted QECCs; third, a scheme that uses the phase bit of a pre-shared ebit, combined with QECCs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Bounds on concatenated entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes
Authors:
Nihar Ranjan Dash,
Sanjoy Dutta,
R. Srikanth,
Subhashish Banerjee
Abstract:
Entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes (EAQECCs) make use of pre-shared entanglement to enhance the rate of error correction and communication. We study the concatenation of EAQECCs, in specific showing how the order of concatenation affects the number of ebits consumed, the logical error probability, the pseudo-threshold, and the violation of the quantum Hamming bound. We find that…
▽ More
Entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes (EAQECCs) make use of pre-shared entanglement to enhance the rate of error correction and communication. We study the concatenation of EAQECCs, in specific showing how the order of concatenation affects the number of ebits consumed, the logical error probability, the pseudo-threshold, and the violation of the quantum Hamming bound. We find that if the quaternary code from which an EAQECC is derived saturates the Griesmer (resp., Plotkin) bound, then the derived code will saturate the Griesmer (resp., linear Plotkin) bound for EAQECCs. We present families of concatenated EAQECCs that saturate the quantum Singleton, Griesmer, and linear Plotkin bounds for EAQECCs.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Facets of correlated non-Markovian channels
Authors:
Vivek Balasaheb Sabale,
Nihar Ranjan Dash,
Atul Kumar,
Subhashish Banerjee
Abstract:
We investigate the domain of correlated non-Markovian channels, exploring the potential memory arising from the correlated action of channels and the inherent memory due to non-Markovian dynamics. The impact of channel correlations is studied using different non-Markovianity indicators and measures. In addition, the dynamical aspects of correlated non-Markovian channels, including entanglement dyn…
▽ More
We investigate the domain of correlated non-Markovian channels, exploring the potential memory arising from the correlated action of channels and the inherent memory due to non-Markovian dynamics. The impact of channel correlations is studied using different non-Markovianity indicators and measures. In addition, the dynamical aspects of correlated non-Markovian channels, including entanglement dynamics as well as changes in the volume of accessible states, are explored. The analysis is presented for both unital and non-unital correlated channels. A new correlated channel constructed with modified Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise is also presented and explored. Further, the geometrical effects of the non-Markovianity of the correlated non-Markovian channels are discussed with a study of change in the volume of the accessible states. The link between the correlation factor and error correction success probability is highlighted.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2024; v1 submitted 10 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Concatenating quantum error-correcting codes with decoherence-free subspaces and vice versa
Authors:
Nihar Ranjan Dash,
Sanjoy Dutta,
R. Srikanth,
Subhashish Banerjee
Abstract:
Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) and decoherence-free subspace (DFS) codes provide active and passive means, respectively, to address certain types of errors that arise during quantum computation. The latter technique is suitable to correct correlated errors with certain symmetries and the former to correct independent errors. The concatenation of a QECC and a DFS code results in a degenerat…
▽ More
Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) and decoherence-free subspace (DFS) codes provide active and passive means, respectively, to address certain types of errors that arise during quantum computation. The latter technique is suitable to correct correlated errors with certain symmetries and the former to correct independent errors. The concatenation of a QECC and a DFS code results in a degenerate code that splits into actively and passively correcting parts, with the degeneracy impacting either part, leading to degenerate errors as well as degenerate stabilizer operators. The concatenation of the two types of code can aid universal fault-tolerant quantum computation when a mix of correlated and independent errors is encountered. In particular, we show that for sufficiently strongly correlated errors, the concatenation with the DFS as the inner code provides better entanglement fidelity, whereas for sufficiently independent errors, the concatenation with the QECC as the inner code is preferable. As illustrative examples, we examine in detail the concatenation of a two-qubit DFS code and a three-qubit repetition code or five-qubit Knill-Laflamme code, under independent and correlated errors.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2024; v1 submitted 13 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
