Environment Scan of Generative AI Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Science
Authors:
Betina Idnay,
Zihan Xu,
William G. Adams,
Mohammad Adibuzzaman,
Nicholas R. Anderson,
Neil Bahroos,
Douglas S. Bell,
Cody Bumgardner,
Thomas Campion,
Mario Castro,
James J. Cimino,
I. Glenn Cohen,
David Dorr,
Peter L Elkin,
Jungwei W. Fan,
Todd Ferris,
David J. Foran,
David Hanauer,
Mike Hogarth,
Kun Huang,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,
Manoj Kandpal,
Niranjan S. Karnik,
Avnish Katoch,
Albert M. Lai
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at the United States. With t…
▽ More
This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at the United States. With the rapid advancement of GenAI technologies, including large language models (LLMs), healthcare institutions face unprecedented opportunities and challenges. This research explores the current status of GenAI integration, focusing on stakeholder roles, governance structures, and ethical considerations by administering a survey among leaders of health institutions (i.e., representing academic medical centers and health systems) to assess the institutional readiness and approach towards GenAI adoption. Key findings indicate a diverse range of institutional strategies, with most organizations in the experimental phase of GenAI deployment. The study highlights significant variations in governance models, with a strong preference for centralized decision-making but notable gaps in workforce training and ethical oversight. Moreover, the results underscore the need for a more coordinated approach to GenAI governance, emphasizing collaboration among senior leaders, clinicians, information technology staff, and researchers. Our analysis also reveals concerns regarding GenAI bias, data security, and stakeholder trust, which must be addressed to ensure the ethical and effective implementation of GenAI technologies. This study offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of GenAI integration in healthcare, providing a roadmap for institutions aiming to leverage GenAI for improved quality of care and operational efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
