-
A Preliminary Study for the development of an Early Method for the Measurement in Function Points of a Software Product
Authors:
Ramon Asensio Monge,
Francisco Sanchis Marco,
Fernando Torre Cervigon,
Victor Garcia Garcia,
Gustavo Uria Paino
Abstract:
The Function Points Analysis (FPA) of A.J. Albrecht is a method to determine the functional size of software products. The International Function Point Users Group, (IFPUG), establishes the FPA like a standard in the software functional size measurement. The IFPUG [3] [4] method follows the Albrecht's method and incorporates in its succesive versions modifications to the rules and hints with the…
▽ More
The Function Points Analysis (FPA) of A.J. Albrecht is a method to determine the functional size of software products. The International Function Point Users Group, (IFPUG), establishes the FPA like a standard in the software functional size measurement. The IFPUG [3] [4] method follows the Albrecht's method and incorporates in its succesive versions modifications to the rules and hints with the intention of improving it [7]. The required documentation level to apply the method is the functional specification which corresponds to level I in the Rudolph's clasification [8]. This documentation is avalaible with some difficulty for those companies which are dedicated to develop software for third parties when they have to prepare the appropiate budget for this development. Then, we face the need of developing an early method [6] [9] for measuring the functional size of a software product that we will name to abbreviate it Early Method or EFPM (Early Function Point Method). The required documentation to apply the EFPM would be the User Requirements or some analogous documentations. This is a part of a research work now in process in Oviedo University. In this article we only show the following, results:
From the measurements of a set of projects using the IFPUG method v. 4.1 we obtain the linear correlation coefficients between the total number of Function Points for each project and the counters of the ILFs number, ILFs+EIFs number and EIs+EOs+EQs number.
Using the preliminary results we compute the regression functions. This results we will allow us to determine the factors to be considered in the development of EFPM and to estimate the function points.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2004;
originally announced February 2004.
-
The analysis of the IFPUG method sensitivity
Authors:
R. Asensio Monge,
F. Sanchis Marco,
F. Torre Cervigon
Abstract:
J. Albrecht`s Function Point Analysis (FPA) is a method to determine the functional size of software products. An organization called International Function Point Users Group (IPFUG), considers the FPA as a standard in the software functional size measurement. The Albrechts method is followed by IPFUG method which includes some modifications in order to improve it. A limitation of the method ref…
▽ More
J. Albrecht`s Function Point Analysis (FPA) is a method to determine the functional size of software products. An organization called International Function Point Users Group (IPFUG), considers the FPA as a standard in the software functional size measurement. The Albrechts method is followed by IPFUG method which includes some modifications in order to improve it. A limitation of the method refers to the fact that FPA is not sensitive enough to differentiate the functional size in small enhancements. That affects the productivity analysis, where the software product functional size is required. To provide more power to the functional size measurement, A. Abran, M. Maya and H. Nguyeckim have proposed some modifications to improve it. The IPFUG v 4.1 method which includes these modifications is named IFPUG v 4.1 extended. In this work we set the conditions to delimiting granular from non granular functions and we calculate the static calibration and sensitivity graphs for the measurements of a set of projects with a high percentage of granular functions, all of then measured with the IFPUG v 4.1 method and the IFPUG v 4.1 extended. Finally, we introduce a statistic analysis in order to determine whether significant differences exist between both methods or not.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2002;
originally announced June 2002.
-
An Assessment of the Consistency for Software Measurement Methods
Authors:
R. Asensio Monge,
F. Sanchis Marco,
F. Torre Cervigon
Abstract:
Consistency, defined as the requirement that a series of measurements of the same project carried out by different raters using the same method should produce similar results, is one of the most important aspects to be taken into account in the measurement methods of the software. In spite of this, there is a widespread view that many measurement methods introduce an undesirable amount of subjec…
▽ More
Consistency, defined as the requirement that a series of measurements of the same project carried out by different raters using the same method should produce similar results, is one of the most important aspects to be taken into account in the measurement methods of the software. In spite of this, there is a widespread view that many measurement methods introduce an undesirable amount of subjectivity in the measurement process. This perception has made several organizations develop revisions of the standard methods whose main aim is to improve their consistency by introducing some suitable modifications of those aspects which are believed to introduce a greater degree of subjectivity.Each revision of a method must be empirically evaluated to determine to what extent is the aim of improving its consistency achieved. In this article we will define an homogeneous statistic intended to describe the consistency level of a method, and we will develop the statistical analysis which should be carried out in order to conclude whether or not a measurement method is more consistent than other one.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2002;
originally announced April 2002.
