Insights From the NeurIPS 2021 NetHack Challenge
Authors:
Eric Hambro,
Sharada Mohanty,
Dmitrii Babaev,
Minwoo Byeon,
Dipam Chakraborty,
Edward Grefenstette,
Minqi Jiang,
Daejin Jo,
Anssi Kanervisto,
Jongmin Kim,
Sungwoong Kim,
Robert Kirk,
Vitaly Kurin,
Heinrich Küttler,
Taehwon Kwon,
Donghoon Lee,
Vegard Mella,
Nantas Nardelli,
Ivan Nazarov,
Nikita Ovsov,
Jack Parker-Holder,
Roberta Raileanu,
Karolis Ramanauskas,
Tim Rocktäschel,
Danielle Rothermel
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this report, we summarize the takeaways from the first NeurIPS 2021 NetHack Challenge. Participants were tasked with developing a program or agent that can win (i.e., 'ascend' in) the popular dungeon-crawler game of NetHack by interacting with the NetHack Learning Environment (NLE), a scalable, procedurally generated, and challenging Gym environment for reinforcement learning (RL). The challeng…
▽ More
In this report, we summarize the takeaways from the first NeurIPS 2021 NetHack Challenge. Participants were tasked with developing a program or agent that can win (i.e., 'ascend' in) the popular dungeon-crawler game of NetHack by interacting with the NetHack Learning Environment (NLE), a scalable, procedurally generated, and challenging Gym environment for reinforcement learning (RL). The challenge showcased community-driven progress in AI with many diverse approaches significantly beating the previously best results on NetHack. Furthermore, it served as a direct comparison between neural (e.g., deep RL) and symbolic AI, as well as hybrid systems, demonstrating that on NetHack symbolic bots currently outperform deep RL by a large margin. Lastly, no agent got close to winning the game, illustrating NetHack's suitability as a long-term benchmark for AI research.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
