Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Bundala, D

On Systematic Testing for Execution-Time Analysis

Authors: Daniel Bundala, Sanjit A. Seshia

Abstract: Given a program and a time deadline, does the program finish before the deadline when executed on a given platform? With the requirement to produce a test case when such a violation can occur, we refer to this problem as the worst-case execution-time testing (WCETT) problem. In this paper, we present an approach for solving the WCETT problem for loop-free programs by timing the execution of a pr… ▽ More Given a program and a time deadline, does the program finish before the deadline when executed on a given platform? With the requirement to produce a test case when such a violation can occur, we refer to this problem as the worst-case execution-time testing (WCETT) problem. In this paper, we present an approach for solving the WCETT problem for loop-free programs by timing the execution of a program on a small number of carefully calculated inputs. We then create a sequence of integer linear programs the solutions of which encode the best timing model consistent with the measurements. By solving the programs we can find the worst-case input as well as estimate execution time of any other input. Our solution is more accurate than previous approaches and, unlikely previous work, by increasing the number of measurements we can produce WCETT bounds up to any desired accuracy. Timing of a program depends on the properties of the platform it executes on. We further show how our approach can be used to quantify the timing repeatability of the underlying platform. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Optimal-Depth Sorting Networks

Authors: Daniel Bundala, Michael Codish, Luís Cruz-Filipe, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Jakub Závodný

Abstract: We solve a 40-year-old open problem on the depth optimality of sorting networks. In 1973, Donald E. Knuth detailed, in Volume 3 of "The Art of Computer Programming", sorting networks of the smallest depth known at the time for n =< 16 inputs, quoting optimality for n =< 8. In 1989, Parberry proved the optimality of the networks with 9 =< n =< 10 inputs. In this article, we present a general techni… ▽ More We solve a 40-year-old open problem on the depth optimality of sorting networks. In 1973, Donald E. Knuth detailed, in Volume 3 of "The Art of Computer Programming", sorting networks of the smallest depth known at the time for n =< 16 inputs, quoting optimality for n =< 8. In 1989, Parberry proved the optimality of the networks with 9 =< n =< 10 inputs. In this article, we present a general technique for obtaining such optimality results, and use it to prove the optimality of the remaining open cases of 11 =< n =< 16 inputs. We show how to exploit symmetry to construct a small set of two-layer networks on n inputs such that if there is a sorting network on n inputs of a given depth, then there is one whose first layers are in this set. For each network in the resulting set, we construct a propositional formula whose satisfiability is necessary for the existence of a sorting network of a given depth. Using an off-the-shelf SAT solver we show that the sorting networks listed by Knuth are optimal. For n =< 10 inputs, our algorithm is orders of magnitude faster than the prior ones. △ Less

Submitted 17 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

On the Complexity of Temporal-Logic Path Checking

Authors: Daniel Bundala, Joël Ouaknine

Abstract: Given a formula in a temporal logic such as LTL or MTL, a fundamental problem is the complexity of evaluating the formula on a given finite word. For LTL, the complexity of this task was recently shown to be in NC. In this paper, we present an NC algorithm for MTL, a quantitative (or metric) extension of LTL, and give an NCC algorithm for UTL, the unary fragment of LTL. At the time of writing, MTL… ▽ More Given a formula in a temporal logic such as LTL or MTL, a fundamental problem is the complexity of evaluating the formula on a given finite word. For LTL, the complexity of this task was recently shown to be in NC. In this paper, we present an NC algorithm for MTL, a quantitative (or metric) extension of LTL, and give an NCC algorithm for UTL, the unary fragment of LTL. At the time of writing, MTL is the most expressive logic with an NC path-checking algorithm, and UTL is the most expressive fragment of LTL with a more efficient path-checking algorithm than for full LTL (subject to standard complexity-theoretic assumptions). We then establish a connection between LTL path checking and planar circuits, which we exploit to show that any further progress in determining the precise complexity of LTL path checking would immediately entail more efficient evaluation algorithms than are known for a certain class of planar circuits. The connection further implies that the complexity of LTL path checking depends on the Boolean connectives allowed: adding Boolean exclusive or yields a temporal logic with P-complete path-checking problem. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2014; v1 submitted 29 December, 2013; originally announced December 2013.

Optimal Sorting Networks

Authors: Daniel Bundala, Jakub Závodný

Abstract: This paper settles the optimality of sorting networks given in The Art of Computer Programming vol. 3 more than 40 years ago. The book lists efficient sorting networks with n <= 16 inputs. In this paper we give general combinatorial arguments showing that if a sorting network with a given depth exists then there exists one with a special form. We then construct propositional formulas whose satisfi… ▽ More This paper settles the optimality of sorting networks given in The Art of Computer Programming vol. 3 more than 40 years ago. The book lists efficient sorting networks with n <= 16 inputs. In this paper we give general combinatorial arguments showing that if a sorting network with a given depth exists then there exists one with a special form. We then construct propositional formulas whose satisfiability is necessary for the existence of such a network. Using a SAT solver we conclude that the listed networks have optimal depth. For n <= 10 inputs where optimality was known previously, our algorithm is four orders of magnitude faster than those in prior work. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2013; v1 submitted 23 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.