Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Bruyneel, B

Evidence for coexisting shapes in $^{98}$Zr through lifetime measurements

Authors: Purnima Singh, W. Korten, T. W. Hagen, A. Görgen, L. Grente, M. -D. Salsac, F. Farget, E. Clément, G. de France, T. Braunroth, B. Bruyneel, I. Celikovic, O. Delaune, A. Dewald, A. Dijon, J. -P. Delaroche, M. Girod, M. Hackstein, B. Jacquot, J. Libert, J. Litzinger, J. Ljungvall, C. Louchart, A. Gottardo, C. Michelagnoli , et al. (13 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The lifetimes of first excited 2$^+$, 4$^+$ and 6$^+$ states in $^{98}$Zr were measured with the Recoil-Distance Doppler Shift method in an experiment performed at GANIL. Excited states in $^{98}$Zr were populated using the fission reaction between a 6.2 MeV/u $^{238}$U beam and a $^{9}$Be target. The $γ$ rays were detected with the EXOGAM array in correlation with the fission fragments identified… ▽ More The lifetimes of first excited 2$^+$, 4$^+$ and 6$^+$ states in $^{98}$Zr were measured with the Recoil-Distance Doppler Shift method in an experiment performed at GANIL. Excited states in $^{98}$Zr were populated using the fission reaction between a 6.2 MeV/u $^{238}$U beam and a $^{9}$Be target. The $γ$ rays were detected with the EXOGAM array in correlation with the fission fragments identified in mass and atomic number in the VAMOS++ spectrometer. Our result shows very small B(E2;2$_1^+$ $\rightarrow$ 0$_1^+$) value in $^{98}$Zr thereby confirming the very sudden onset of collectivity at $N=60$. The experimental results are compared to large-scale Monte Carlo Shell model and beyond mean field calculations. The present results indicate coexistence of two additional deformed shapes in this nucleus along with the spherical ground state. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Collectivity in the light radon nuclei measured directly via Coulomb excitation

Authors: L. P. Gaffney, A. P. Robinson, D. G. Jenkins, A. N. Andreyev, M. Bender, A. Blazhev, N. Bree, B. Bruyneel, P. A. Butler, T. E. Cocolios, T. Davinson, A. N. Deacon, H. De Witte, D. DiJulio, J. Diriken, A. Ekström, Ch. Fransen, S. J. Freeman, K. Geibel, T. Grahn, B. Hadinia, M. Hass, P. -H. Heenen, H. Hess, M. Huyse , et al. (27 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Background: Shape coexistence in heavy nuclei poses a strong challenge to state-of-the-art nuclear models, where several competing shape minima are found close to the ground state. A classic region for investigating this phenomenon is in the region around $Z=82$ and the neutron mid-shell at $N=104$. Purpose: Evidence for shape coexistence has been inferred from $α$-decay measurements, laser spec… ▽ More Background: Shape coexistence in heavy nuclei poses a strong challenge to state-of-the-art nuclear models, where several competing shape minima are found close to the ground state. A classic region for investigating this phenomenon is in the region around $Z=82$ and the neutron mid-shell at $N=104$. Purpose: Evidence for shape coexistence has been inferred from $α$-decay measurements, laser spectroscopy and in-beam measurements. While the latter allow the pattern of excited states and rotational band structures to be mapped out, a detailed understanding of shape coexistence can only come from measurements of electromagnetic matrix elements. Method: Secondary, radioactive ion beams of $^{202}$Rn and $^{204}$Rn were studied by means of low-energy Coulomb excitation at the REX-ISOLDE facility in CERN. Results: The electric-quadrupole ($E2$) matrix element connecting the ground state and first-excited $2^{+}_{1}$ state was extracted for both $^{202}$Rn and $^{204}$Rn, corresponding to ${B(E2;2^{+}_{1} \to 2^{+}_{1})=29^{+8}_{-8}}$ W.u. and $43^{+17}_{-12}$ W.u., respectively. Additionally, $E2$ matrix elements connecting the $2^{+}_{1}$ state with the $4^{+}_{1}$ and $2^{+}_{2}$ states were determined in $^{202}$Rn. No excited $0^{+}$ states were observed in the current data set, possibly due to a limited population of second-order processes at the currently-available beam energies. Conclusions: The results are discussed in terms of collectivity and the deformation of both nuclei studied is deduced to be weak, as expected from the low-lying level-energy schemes. Comparisons are also made to state-of-the-art beyond-mean-field model calculations and the magnitude of the transitional quadrupole moments are well reproduced. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Comments: 12 pages, 14 figures

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. C 91, 064313 (2015)

High-spin structure in $^{40}$K

Authors: P. -A. Söderström, F. Recchia, J. Nyberg, A. Gadea, S. M. Lenzi, A. Poves, A. Ataç, S. Aydin, D. Bazzacco, P. Bednarczyk, M. Bellato, B. Birkenbach, D. Bortolato, A. J. Boston, H. C. Boston, B. Bruyneel, D. Bucurescu, E. Calore, B. Cederwall, L. Charles, J. Chavas, S. Colosimo, F. C. L. Crespi, D. M. Cullen, G. de Angelis , et al. (52 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: High-spin states of $^{40}$K have been populated in the fusion-evaporation reaction $^{12}$C($^{30}$Si,np)$^{40}$K and studied by means of $γ$-ray spectroscopy techniques using one AGATA triple cluster detector, at INFN - Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro. Several new states with excitation energy up to 8 MeV and spin up to $10^-$ have been discovered. These new states are discussed in terms of J=3… ▽ More High-spin states of $^{40}$K have been populated in the fusion-evaporation reaction $^{12}$C($^{30}$Si,np)$^{40}$K and studied by means of $γ$-ray spectroscopy techniques using one AGATA triple cluster detector, at INFN - Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro. Several new states with excitation energy up to 8 MeV and spin up to $10^-$ have been discovered. These new states are discussed in terms of J=3 and T=0 neutron-proton hole pairs. Shell-model calculations in a large model space have shown a good agreement with the experimental data for most of the energy levels. The evolution of the structure of this nucleus is here studied as a function of excitation energy and angular momentum. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.

Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. C

Response of AGATA Segmented HPGe Detectors to Gamma Rays up to 15.1 MeV

Authors: F. C. L. Crespi, R. Avigo, F. Camera, S. Akkoyun, A. Atac, D. Bazzacco, M. Bellato, G. Benzoni, N. Blasi, D. Bortolato, S. Bottoni, A. Bracco, S. Brambilla, B. Bruyneel, S. Cerutia, M. Ciemala, S. Coelli, J. Eberth, C. Fanin, E. Farnea, A. Gadea, A. Giaz, A. Gottardo, H. Hess, M. Kmiecik , et al. (16 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The response of AGATA segmented HPGe detectors to gamma rays in the energy range 2-15 MeV was measured. The 15.1 MeV gamma rays were produced using the reaction d(11B,ng)12C at Ebeam = 19.1 MeV, while gamma-rays between 2 to 9 MeV were produced using an Am-Be-Fe radioactive source. The energy resolution and linearity were studied and the energy-to-pulse-height conversion resulted to be linear with… ▽ More The response of AGATA segmented HPGe detectors to gamma rays in the energy range 2-15 MeV was measured. The 15.1 MeV gamma rays were produced using the reaction d(11B,ng)12C at Ebeam = 19.1 MeV, while gamma-rays between 2 to 9 MeV were produced using an Am-Be-Fe radioactive source. The energy resolution and linearity were studied and the energy-to-pulse-height conversion resulted to be linear within 0.05%. Experimental interaction multiplicity distributions are discussed and compared with the results of Geant4 simulations. It is shown that the application of gamma-ray tracking allows a suppression of background radiation following neutron capture by Ge nuclei. Finally the Doppler correction for the 15.1 MeV gamma line, performed using the position information extracted with Pulse-shape Analysis, is discussed. △ Less

Submitted 6 September, 2012; originally announced September 2012.

Comments: 10 pages, 11 figures

MSC Class: 81V35

AGATA - Advanced Gamma Tracking Array

Authors: S. Akkoyun, A. Algora, B. Alikhani, F. Ameil, G. de Angelis, L. Arnold, A. Astier, A. Ataç, Y. Aubert, C. Aufranc, A. Austin, S. Aydin, F. Azaiez, S. Badoer, D. L. Balabanski, D. Barrientos, G. Baulieu, R. Baumann, D. Bazzacco, F. A. Beck, T. Beck, P. Bednarczyk, M. Bellato, M. A. Bentley, G. Benzoni , et al. (329 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Advanced GAmma Tracking Array (AGATA) is a European project to develop and operate the next generation gamma-ray spectrometer. AGATA is based on the technique of gamma-ray energy tracking in electrically segmented high-purity germanium crystals. This technique requires the accurate determination of the energy, time and position of every interaction as a gamma ray deposits its energy within the… ▽ More The Advanced GAmma Tracking Array (AGATA) is a European project to develop and operate the next generation gamma-ray spectrometer. AGATA is based on the technique of gamma-ray energy tracking in electrically segmented high-purity germanium crystals. This technique requires the accurate determination of the energy, time and position of every interaction as a gamma ray deposits its energy within the detector volume. Reconstruction of the full interaction path results in a detector with very high efficiency and excellent spectral response. The realization of gamma-ray tracking and AGATA is a result of many technical advances. These include the development of encapsulated highly-segmented germanium detectors assembled in a triple cluster detector cryostat, an electronics system with fast digital sampling and a data acquisition system to process the data at a high rate. The full characterization of the crystals was measured and compared with detector-response simulations. This enabled pulse-shape analysis algorithms, to extract energy, time and position, to be employed. In addition, tracking algorithms for event reconstruction were developed. The first phase of AGATA is now complete and operational in its first physics campaign. In the future AGATA will be moved between laboratories in Europe and operated in a series of campaigns to take advantage of the different beams and facilities available to maximize its science output. The paper reviews all the achievements made in the AGATA project including all the necessary infrastructure to operate and support the spectrometer. △ Less

Submitted 17 September, 2012; v1 submitted 24 November, 2011; originally announced November 2011.

Comments: This version contains a correction of a typing error in the caption of Fig. 2. The DOI to the article published in Nucl. Instr. Meth A was also added