-
The Straw Tracking Detector for the Fermilab Muon $g-2$ Experiment
Authors:
B. T. King,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
D. Beckner,
A. Behnke,
T. J. V. Bowcock,
D. Boyden,
R. M. Carey,
J. Carroll,
B. C. K. Casey,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett,
M. Eads,
A. Epps,
S. B. Foster,
D. Gastler,
S. Grant,
T. Halewood-Leagas,
K. Hardin,
E. Hazen,
G. Hesketh,
D. J. Hollywood,
T. Jones,
C. Kenziora
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuu…
▽ More
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuum chamber in a region where the magnetic field is large and non-uniform. As such, the tracking detector must have a low leak rate to maintain a high-quality vacuum, must be non-magnetic so as not to perturb the magnetic field and, to minimize energy loss, must have a low radiation length. The performance of the tracking detector has met or surpassed the design requirements, with adequate electronic noise levels, an average straw hit resolution of $(110 \pm 20) \,μ$m, a detection efficiency of 97% or higher, and no performance degradation or signs of aging. The tracking detector's measurements result in an otherwise unachievable understanding of the muon's beam motion, particularly at early times in the experiment's measurement period when there are a significantly greater number of muons decaying. This is vital to the statistical power of the experiment, as well as facilitating the precise extraction of several systematic corrections and uncertainties. This paper describes the design, construction, testing, commissioning, and performance of the tracking detector.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022; v1 submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Semantic Prediction: Which One Should Come First, Recognition or Prediction?
Authors:
Hafez Farazi,
Jan Nogga,
and Sven Behnke
Abstract:
The ultimate goal of video prediction is not forecasting future pixel-values given some previous frames. Rather, the end goal of video prediction is to discover valuable internal representations from the vast amount of available unlabeled video data in a self-supervised fashion for downstream tasks. One of the primary downstream tasks is interpreting the scene's semantic composition and using it f…
▽ More
The ultimate goal of video prediction is not forecasting future pixel-values given some previous frames. Rather, the end goal of video prediction is to discover valuable internal representations from the vast amount of available unlabeled video data in a self-supervised fashion for downstream tasks. One of the primary downstream tasks is interpreting the scene's semantic composition and using it for decision-making. For example, by predicting human movements, an observer can anticipate human activities and collaborate in a shared workspace. There are two main ways to achieve the same outcome, given a pre-trained video prediction and pre-trained semantic extraction model; one can first apply predictions and then extract semantics or first extract semantics and then predict. We investigate these configurations using the Local Frequency Domain Transformer Network (LFDTN) as the video prediction model and U-Net as the semantic extraction model on synthetic and real datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm
Authors:
B. Abi,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
L. P. Alonzi,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
F. Azfar,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
A. Behnke,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
R. Bjorkquist,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico
, et al. (212 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in…
▽ More
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ${\tildeω'^{}_p}$ in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^{\circ}$C. The ratio $ω_a / {\tildeω'^{}_p}$, together with known fundamental constants, determines $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.46\,ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both $μ^+$ and $μ^-$, the new experimental average of $a_μ({\rm Exp}) = 116\,592\,061(41)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.35\,ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
