-
The participation of public in knowledge production: a citizen science projects overview
Authors:
Nuria Bautista-Puig,
Enrique Orduna-Malea,
Philippe Mongeon
Abstract:
Citizen Science (CS) is related to public engagement in scientific research. The tasks in which the citizens can be involved are diverse and can range from data collection and tagging images to participation in the planning and research design. However, little is known about the involvement degree of the citizens to CS projects, and the contribution of those projects to the advancement of knowledg…
▽ More
Citizen Science (CS) is related to public engagement in scientific research. The tasks in which the citizens can be involved are diverse and can range from data collection and tagging images to participation in the planning and research design. However, little is known about the involvement degree of the citizens to CS projects, and the contribution of those projects to the advancement of knowledge (e.g. scientific outcomes). This study aims to gain a better understanding by analysing the SciStarter database. A total of 2,346 CS projects were identified, mainly from Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Of these projects, 91% show low participation of the citizens (Level 1 "citizens as sensors" and 2 "citizens as interpreters", from Haklay's scale). In terms of scientific output, 918 papers indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) were identified. The most prolific projects were found to have lower levels of citizen involvement, specifically at Levels 1 and 2.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Research assessment under debate: disentangling the interest around the DORA declaration on Twitter
Authors:
E. Orduna-Malea,
N. Bautista-Puig
Abstract:
Much debate has been around the misapplication of metrics in research assessment. As a result of this concern, the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was launched, an initiative that caused opposing viewpoints. However, the discussion topics about DORA have not been formally identified, especially in participatory environments outside the scholarly communication process, such as social netw…
▽ More
Much debate has been around the misapplication of metrics in research assessment. As a result of this concern, the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was launched, an initiative that caused opposing viewpoints. However, the discussion topics about DORA have not been formally identified, especially in participatory environments outside the scholarly communication process, such as social networks. This paper contributes to that end by analyzing 20,717 DORA-related tweets published from 2015 to 2022. The results show an increasing volume of tweets, mainly promotional and informative, but with limited participation of users, either commenting or engaging with the tweets, generating a scarcely polarized conversation driven primarily by a few DORA promoters. While a varied list of discussion topics is found (especially "Open science and research assessment," "Academics career assessment & innovation," and "Journal Impact Factor"), the DORA debate appears as part of broader conversations (research evaluation, open science). Further studies are needed to check whether these results are restricted to Twitter or reveal more general patterns. The findings might interest the different evaluators and evaluated agents regarding their interests and concerns around the reforms in the research evaluation.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2023; v1 submitted 20 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
OSDG 2.0: a multilingual tool for classifying text data by UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Authors:
Lukas Pukelis,
Nuria Bautista-Puig,
Gustė Statulevičiūtė,
Vilius Stančiauskas,
Gokhan Dikmener,
Dina Akylbekova
Abstract:
Despite concrete indicators and targets, monitoring the progress of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remains a challenge, given the many different actors, initiatives, and institutions involved. OSDG, an open-source classification tool aims to help navigate the SDG related ambiguities through a simple and easy to use application. The tool allows to map and connect activities to the SDGs…
▽ More
Despite concrete indicators and targets, monitoring the progress of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remains a challenge, given the many different actors, initiatives, and institutions involved. OSDG, an open-source classification tool aims to help navigate the SDG related ambiguities through a simple and easy to use application. The tool allows to map and connect activities to the SDGs by identifying SDG -relevant content in any text. This paper presents OSDG 2.0, a new iteration of the partnership's work, which marks a significant improvement in the tool's methodology, as well as support for content in 15 languages.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Measuring web connectivity between research organizations through ROR identifiers
Authors:
Enrique Orduna-Malea,
Nuria Bautista-Puig
Abstract:
Digital information needs to be accessed and used in a manageable and sustainable manner to facilitate the advancement of science and science management. Many types of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) are already in use and well-established in support of the scholarly communication industry, mainly digital objects (e.g., DOIs) and person identifiers (e.g., ORCID). PIDs improve the interoperability of…
▽ More
Digital information needs to be accessed and used in a manageable and sustainable manner to facilitate the advancement of science and science management. Many types of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) are already in use and well-established in support of the scholarly communication industry, mainly digital objects (e.g., DOIs) and person identifiers (e.g., ORCID). PIDs improve the interoperability of digital entities, make them reusable, and, at the same time, foster FAIR principles. The main objective of this exploratory work is to measure the degree and type of use of ROR identifiers by the online scientific and academic ecosystem through link-based indicators. The analysis yielded 149,851 links to ror.org webpages: 147,154 links to ROR-based URLs and 2,698 links to other informative webpages under the ror.org website. The results obtained evidence that the percentage of ROR identifiers linked is limited (51.6% of ROR identifiers have been linked at least once). These links come from a limited number of referring domains (242 unique domain names) and mainly from bibliographic records (51.4% of links) and organization cards (36% of links). While the distribution of ROR identifiers is biased towards Anglo-Saxon countries (mainly United States) and types (companies), the educational research organizations are the institutions most linked through their corresponding ROR-based URLs. The connectivity between DOIs, ORCIDs and RORs can be the spearhead to carry out new webometric and bibliometric studies, of interest to characterize the presence, impact, and interconnection of the global academic Web.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Do journals flipping to Gold Open Access show an OA Citation or Publication Advantage?
Authors:
Nuria Bautista-Puig,
Carmen Lopez-Illescas,
Felix de Moya-Anegon,
Vicente Guerrero-Bote,
Henk F. Moed
Abstract:
The effects of Open Access (OA) upon journal performance are investigated. The key research question holds: How does the citation impact and publication output of journals switching ('flipping') from non-OA to Gold-OA develop after their switch to Gold-OA? A review is given of the literature, with an emphasis on studies dealing with flipping journals. Two study sets with 119 and 100 flipping journ…
▽ More
The effects of Open Access (OA) upon journal performance are investigated. The key research question holds: How does the citation impact and publication output of journals switching ('flipping') from non-OA to Gold-OA develop after their switch to Gold-OA? A review is given of the literature, with an emphasis on studies dealing with flipping journals. Two study sets with 119 and 100 flipping journals, derived from two different OA data sources (DOAJ and OAD), are compared with two control groups, one based on a standard bibliometric criterion, and a second controlling for a journal's national orientation. Comparing post-switch indicators with pre-switch ones in paired T-tests, evidence was obtained of an OA Citation advantage but not of an OA Publication Advantage. Shifts in the affiliation countries of publishing and citing authors are characterized in terms of countries' income class and geographical world region. Suggestions are made for qualitative follow-up studies to obtain more insight into OA flipping or reverse-flipping
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Unveiling the research landscape of Sustainable Development Goals and their inclusion in Higher Education Institutions and Research Centers: major trends in 2000-2017
Authors:
Nuria Bautista-Puig,
Ana Marta Aleixo,
Susana Leal,
Ulisses Azeiteiro,
Rodrigo Costas
Abstract:
Sustainable Development Goals are the blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for society. Its legacy is linked with the Millennium Development Goals, set up in 2000. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to 1) measure "core" research output from 2000-2017, with the aim to map the global research of sustainability goals, 2) describe thematic specialization based on keywords co-oc…
▽ More
Sustainable Development Goals are the blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for society. Its legacy is linked with the Millennium Development Goals, set up in 2000. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to 1) measure "core" research output from 2000-2017, with the aim to map the global research of sustainability goals, 2) describe thematic specialization based on keywords co-occurrence analysis and strongest citation burst, 3) present a methodology to classify scientific output (based on an ad-hoc glossary) and assess SDGs interconnections.
Sustainability goals publications (core+expand based on direct citations) were identified in-house CWTS Web of Science by using search terms in titles, abstracts, and keywords. 25,299 bibliographic records were analyzed, from which 21,653 (85.59%) are from HEIs and research centres (RC). The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of these organizations in sustainability research. The findings reveal the increasing participation of these organizations in this research (660 institutions in 2000-2005 to 1744 institutions involved in 2012-2017). In terms of specialization, some institutions present a higher production and specialization on the topic (e.g., London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and World Health Organization); however, others present less production but higher specialization (e.g., Stockholm Environment Institute). Regarding the topics, health (especially in developing countries), women and socio-economic aspects are the most prominent ones. Moreover, it is observed the interlinked nature of SDGs between some SDGs in research output (e.g., SDG11 and SDG3). This study provides important orientation for HEIs and RCs in terms of Research, Development and Innovation (R&D+i) to respond to major societal challenges and could be useful for the policymakers in order to promote the research agenda on this topic.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
