-
Capturing continuous, long timescale behavioral changes in $\textit{Drosophila melanogaster}$ postural data
Authors:
Grace C. McKenzie-Smith,
Scott W. Wolf,
Julien F. Ayroles,
Joshua W. Shaevitz
Abstract:
Animal behavior spans many timescales, from short, seconds-scale actions to circadian rhythms over many hours to life-long changes during aging. Most quantitative behavior studies have focused on short-timescale behaviors such as locomotion and grooming. Analysis of these data suggests there exists a hierarchy of timescales; however, the limited duration of these experiments prevents the investiga…
▽ More
Animal behavior spans many timescales, from short, seconds-scale actions to circadian rhythms over many hours to life-long changes during aging. Most quantitative behavior studies have focused on short-timescale behaviors such as locomotion and grooming. Analysis of these data suggests there exists a hierarchy of timescales; however, the limited duration of these experiments prevents the investigation of the full temporal structure. To access longer timescales of behavior, we continuously recorded individual $\textit{Drosophila melanogaster}$ at 100 frames per second for up to 7 days at a time in featureless arenas on sucrose-agarose media. We use the deep learning framework SLEAP to produce a full-body postural data set for 47 individuals resulting in nearly 2 billion pose instances. We identify stereotyped behaviors such as grooming, proboscis extension, and locomotion and use the resulting ethograms to explore how the flies' behavior varies across time of day and days in the experiment. We find distinct circadian patterns in all of our stereotyped behavior and also see changes in behavior over the course of the experiment as the flies weaken and die.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Evolutionary mismatch and the role of GxE interactions in human disease
Authors:
Amanda J. Lea,
Andrew G. Clark,
Andrew W. Dahl,
Orrin Devinsky,
Angela R. Garcia,
Christopher D. Golden,
Joseph Kamau,
Thomas S. Kraft,
Yvonne A. L. Lim,
Dino Martins,
Donald Mogoi,
Paivi Pajukanta,
George Perry,
Herman Pontzer,
Benjamin C. Trumble,
Samuel S. Urlacher,
Vivek V. Venkataraman,
Ian J. Wallace,
Michael Gurven,
Daniel Lieberman,
Julien F. Ayroles
Abstract:
Globally, we are witnessing the rise of complex, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related to changes in our daily environments. Obesity, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes are part of a long list of "lifestyle" diseases that were rare throughout human history but are now common. A key idea from anthropology and evolutionary biology--the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis--seeks to e…
▽ More
Globally, we are witnessing the rise of complex, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related to changes in our daily environments. Obesity, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes are part of a long list of "lifestyle" diseases that were rare throughout human history but are now common. A key idea from anthropology and evolutionary biology--the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis--seeks to explain this phenomenon. It posits that humans evolved in environments that radically differ from the ones experienced by most people today, and thus traits that were advantageous in past environments may now be "mismatched" and disease-causing. This hypothesis is, at its core, a genetic one: it predicts that loci with a history of selection will exhibit "genotype by environment" (GxE) interactions and have differential health effects in ancestral versus modern environments. Here, we discuss how this concept could be leveraged to uncover the genetic architecture of NCDs in a principled way. Specifically, we advocate for partnering with small-scale, subsistence-level groups that are currently transitioning from environments that are arguably more "matched" with their recent evolutionary history to those that are more "mismatched". These populations provide diverse genetic backgrounds as well as the needed levels and types of environmental variation necessary for mapping GxE interactions in an explicit mismatch framework. Such work would make important contributions to our understanding of environmental and genetic risk factors for NCDs across diverse ancestries and sociocultural contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2023; v1 submitted 12 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Behavioral individuality reveals genetic control of phenotypic variability
Authors:
Julien F. Ayroles,
Sean M. Buchanan,
Chelsea Jenney,
Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria,
Jennifer Grenier,
Andrew G. Clark,
Daniel L. Hartl,
Benjamin L. de Bivort
Abstract:
Variability is ubiquitous in nature and a fundamental feature of complex systems. Few studies, however, have investigated variance itself as a trait under genetic control. By focusing primarily on trait means and ignoring the effect of alternative alleles on trait variability, we may be missing an important axis of genetic variation contributing to phenotypic differences among individuals. To stud…
▽ More
Variability is ubiquitous in nature and a fundamental feature of complex systems. Few studies, however, have investigated variance itself as a trait under genetic control. By focusing primarily on trait means and ignoring the effect of alternative alleles on trait variability, we may be missing an important axis of genetic variation contributing to phenotypic differences among individuals. To study genetic effects on individual-to-individual phenotypic variability (or intragenotypic variability), we used a panel of Drosophila inbred lines and focused on locomotor handedness, in an assay optimized to measure variability. We discovered that some lines had consistently high levels of intragenotypic variability among individuals while others had low levels. We demonstrate that the degree of variability is itself heritable. Using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for the degree of intragenotypic variability as the phenotype across lines, we identified several genes expressed in the brain that affect variability in handedness without affecting the mean. One of these genes, Ten-a, implicated a neuropil in the central complex of the fly brain as influencing the magnitude of behavioral variability, a brain region involved in sensory integration and locomotor coordination. We have validated these results using genetic deficiencies, null alleles, and inducible RNAi transgenes. This study reveals the constellation of phenotypes that can arise from a single genotype and it shows that different genetic backgrounds differ dramatically in their propensity for phenotypic variability. Because traditional mean-focused GWASs ignore the contribution of variability to overall phenotypic variation, current methods may miss important links between genotype and phenotype.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
