Impacts of Social Distancing Policies on Mobility and COVID-19 Case Growth in the US
Authors:
Gregory A. Wellenius,
Swapnil Vispute,
Valeria Espinosa,
Alex Fabrikant,
Thomas C. Tsai,
Jonathan Hennessy,
Andrew Dai,
Brian Williams,
Krishna Gadepalli,
Adam Boulanger,
Adam Pearce,
Chaitanya Kamath,
Arran Schlosberg,
Catherine Bendebury,
Chinmoy Mandayam,
Charlotte Stanton,
Shailesh Bavadekar,
Christopher Pluntke,
Damien Desfontaines,
Benjamin Jacobson,
Zan Armstrong,
Bryant Gipson,
Royce Wilson,
Andrew Widdowson,
Katherine Chou
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Social distancing remains an important strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. However, the impacts of specific state-level policies on mobility and subsequent COVID-19 case trajectories have not been completely quantified. Using anonymized and aggregated mobility data from opted-in Google users, we found that state-level emergency declarations resulted in a 9.9% reduction i…
▽ More
Social distancing remains an important strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. However, the impacts of specific state-level policies on mobility and subsequent COVID-19 case trajectories have not been completely quantified. Using anonymized and aggregated mobility data from opted-in Google users, we found that state-level emergency declarations resulted in a 9.9% reduction in time spent away from places of residence. Implementation of one or more social distancing policies resulted in an additional 24.5% reduction in mobility the following week, and subsequent shelter-in-place mandates yielded an additional 29.0% reduction. Decreases in mobility were associated with substantial reductions in case growth 2 to 4 weeks later. For example, a 10% reduction in mobility was associated with a 17.5% reduction in case growth 2 weeks later. Given the continued reliance on social distancing policies to limit the spread of COVID-19, these results may be helpful to public health officials trying to balance infection control with the economic and social consequences of these policies.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021; v1 submitted 21 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
Voices Obscured in Complex Environmental Settings (VOICES) corpus
Authors:
Colleen Richey,
Maria A. Barrios,
Zeb Armstrong,
Chris Bartels,
Horacio Franco,
Martin Graciarena,
Aaron Lawson,
Mahesh Kumar Nandwana,
Allen Stauffer,
Julien van Hout,
Paul Gamble,
Jeff Hetherly,
Cory Stephenson,
Karl Ni
Abstract:
This paper introduces the Voices Obscured In Complex Environmental Settings (VOICES) corpus, a freely available dataset under Creative Commons BY 4.0. This dataset will promote speech and signal processing research of speech recorded by far-field microphones in noisy room conditions. Publicly available speech corpora are mostly composed of isolated speech at close-range microphony. A typical appro…
▽ More
This paper introduces the Voices Obscured In Complex Environmental Settings (VOICES) corpus, a freely available dataset under Creative Commons BY 4.0. This dataset will promote speech and signal processing research of speech recorded by far-field microphones in noisy room conditions. Publicly available speech corpora are mostly composed of isolated speech at close-range microphony. A typical approach to better represent realistic scenarios, is to convolve clean speech with noise and simulated room response for model training. Despite these efforts, model performance degrades when tested against uncurated speech in natural conditions. For this corpus, audio was recorded in furnished rooms with background noise played in conjunction with foreground speech selected from the LibriSpeech corpus. Multiple sessions were recorded in each room to accommodate for all foreground speech-background noise combinations. Audio was recorded using twelve microphones placed throughout the room, resulting in 120 hours of audio per microphone. This work is a multi-organizational effort led by SRI International and Lab41 with the intent to push forward state-of-the-art distant microphone approaches in signal processing and speech recognition.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2018; v1 submitted 13 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
