Method and System for Image Analysis to Detect Cancer
Authors:
Waleed A. Yousef,
Ahmed A. Abouelkahire,
Deyaaeldeen Almahallawi,
Omar S. Marzouk,
Sameh K. Mohamed,
Waleed A. Mustafa,
Omar M. Osama,
Ali A. Saleh,
Naglaa M. Abdelrazek
Abstract:
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Detection of breast cancer, while it is still small and confined to the breast, provides the best chance of effective treatment. Computer Aided Detection (CAD) systems that detect cancer from mammograms will help in reducing the human errors that lead to missing breast carcinoma. Literature is r…
▽ More
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Detection of breast cancer, while it is still small and confined to the breast, provides the best chance of effective treatment. Computer Aided Detection (CAD) systems that detect cancer from mammograms will help in reducing the human errors that lead to missing breast carcinoma. Literature is rich of scientific papers for methods of CAD design, yet with no complete system architecture to deploy those methods. On the other hand, commercial CADs are developed and deployed only to vendors' mammography machines with no availability to public access. This paper presents a complete CAD; it is complete since it combines, on a hand, the rigor of algorithm design and assessment (method), and, on the other hand, the implementation and deployment of a system architecture for public accessibility (system). (1) We develop a novel algorithm for image enhancement so that mammograms acquired from any digital mammography machine look qualitatively of the same clarity to radiologists' inspection; and is quantitatively standardized for the detection algorithms. (2) We develop novel algorithms for masses and microcalcifications detection with accuracy superior to both literature results and the majority of approved commercial systems. (3) We design, implement, and deploy a system architecture that is computationally effective to allow for deploying these algorithms to cloud for public access.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
Efficient Gradual Typing
Authors:
Andre Kuhlenschmidt,
Deyaaeldeen Almahallawi,
Jeremy G. Siek
Abstract:
Gradual typing combines static and dynamic typing in the same program. One would hope that the performance in a gradually typed language would range between that of a dynamically typed language and a statically typed language. Existing implementations of gradually typed languages have not achieved this goal due to overheads associated with runtime casts. Takikawa et al. (2016) report up to 100…
▽ More
Gradual typing combines static and dynamic typing in the same program. One would hope that the performance in a gradually typed language would range between that of a dynamically typed language and a statically typed language. Existing implementations of gradually typed languages have not achieved this goal due to overheads associated with runtime casts. Takikawa et al. (2016) report up to 100$\times$ slowdowns for partially typed programs. In this paper we present a compiler, named Grift, for evaluating implementation techniques for gradual typing. We take a straightforward but surprisingly unexplored implementation approach for gradual typing, that is, ahead-of-time compilation to native assembly code with carefully chosen runtime representations and space-efficient coercions.
Our experiments show that this approach achieves performance on par with OCaml on statically typed programs and performance between that of Gambit and Racket on untyped programs. On partially typed code, the geometric mean ranges from 0.42$\times$ to 2.36$\times$ that of (untyped) Racket across the benchmarks. We implement casts using the coercions of Siek, Thiemann, and Wadler (2015). This technique eliminates all catastrophic slowdowns without introducing significant overhead. Across the benchmarks, coercions range from 15% slower (fft) to almost 2$\times$ faster (matmult) than regular casts. We also implement the monotonic references of Siek et al. (2015). Monotonic references eliminate all overhead in statically typed code, and for partially typed code, they are faster than proxied references, sometimes up to 1.48$\times$.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
