Sea urchin sperm exploit extremum seeking control to find the egg
Authors:
Mahmoud Abdelgalil,
Yasser Aboelkassem,
Haithem Taha
Abstract:
Sperm cells perform extremely demanding tasks with minimal capabilities. The cells must quickly navigate in a noisy environment to find an egg within a short time window for successful fertilization without any global positioning information. Many research efforts have been dedicated to deriving mathematical principles that explain their superb navigation strategy. Here we show that the navigation…
▽ More
Sperm cells perform extremely demanding tasks with minimal capabilities. The cells must quickly navigate in a noisy environment to find an egg within a short time window for successful fertilization without any global positioning information. Many research efforts have been dedicated to deriving mathematical principles that explain their superb navigation strategy. Here we show that the navigation strategy of sea urchin sperm, also known as helical klinotaxis, is a natural implementation of a well-established adaptive control paradigm known as extremum seeking. This bridge between control theory and the biology of taxis in microorganisms is expected to deepen our understanding of the process. For example, the formulation leads to a coarse-grained model of the signaling pathway that offers new insights on the peculiar switching-like behavior between high and low gain steering modes observed in sea urchin sperm. Moreover, it may guide engineers in developing bio-inspired miniaturized robots with minimal sensors.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2022; v1 submitted 31 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
Considering discrepancy when calibrating a mechanistic electrophysiology model
Authors:
Chon Lok Lei,
Sanmitra Ghosh,
Dominic G. Whittaker,
Yasser Aboelkassem,
Kylie A. Beattie,
Chris D. Cantwell,
Tammo Delhaas,
Charles Houston,
Gustavo Montes Novaes,
Alexander V. Panfilov,
Pras Pathmanathan,
Marina Riabiz,
Rodrigo Weber dos Santos,
John Walmsley,
Keith Worden,
Gary R. Mirams,
Richard D. Wilkinson
Abstract:
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a vital step in using mathematical models and simulations to take decisions. The field of cardiac simulation has begun to explore and adopt UQ methods to characterise uncertainty in model inputs and how that propagates through to outputs or predictions. In this perspective piece we draw attention to an important and under-addressed source of uncertainty in our pr…
▽ More
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a vital step in using mathematical models and simulations to take decisions. The field of cardiac simulation has begun to explore and adopt UQ methods to characterise uncertainty in model inputs and how that propagates through to outputs or predictions. In this perspective piece we draw attention to an important and under-addressed source of uncertainty in our predictions -- that of uncertainty in the model structure or the equations themselves. The difference between imperfect models and reality is termed model discrepancy, and we are often uncertain as to the size and consequences of this discrepancy. Here we provide two examples of the consequences of discrepancy when calibrating models at the ion channel and action potential scales. Furthermore, we attempt to account for this discrepancy when calibrating and validating an ion channel model using different methods, based on modelling the discrepancy using Gaussian processes (GPs) and autoregressive-moving-average (ARMA) models, then highlight the advantages and shortcomings of each approach. Finally, suggestions and lines of enquiry for future work are provided.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2020; v1 submitted 13 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
