-
Electromagnetic and vacuum tests of the PTAK-RFQ module 0
Authors:
Atacan Kılıçgedik,
Aytül Adıgüzel,
Aslıhan Çağlar,
Emre Çelebi,
Şeyma Esen,
Mithat Kaya,
Ümit Kaya,
Veysi Erkcan Özcan,
Görkem Türemen,
Nafiz Gökhan Ünel,
Fatih Yaman
Abstract:
A new Radio-frequency quadrupole (RFQ), which operates at 800 MHz high frequency and will enable to accelerate of the proton beam efficiently was designed at KAHVELab (Kandilli Detector, Accelerator and Instrumentation Laboratory) at Boğaziçi University in İstanbul, Turkey. The so-called PTAK-RFQ, which consists of two modules with a total length of less than one meter will accelerate protons to 2…
▽ More
A new Radio-frequency quadrupole (RFQ), which operates at 800 MHz high frequency and will enable to accelerate of the proton beam efficiently was designed at KAHVELab (Kandilli Detector, Accelerator and Instrumentation Laboratory) at Boğaziçi University in İstanbul, Turkey. The so-called PTAK-RFQ, which consists of two modules with a total length of less than one meter will accelerate protons to 2 MeV at the Proton Testbeam at the Kandilli campus, known as the PTAK project. The prototype of the first module of the 800 MHz PTAK-RFQ (called the PTAK-RFQ module 0), which captures and bunches the proton beam injected from the ion source was fabricated by a local manufacturer from ordinary copper material. The PTAK-RFQ module 0 was subjected to various tests to ensure that its mechanics, pressure, field distribution, and frequency are operationally adjusted. The facilitating solutions emerging from the detailed testing of the PTAK-RFQ module 0 will ultimately guide all mechanical, vacuum, rf testing, final design, and manufacturing processes of the final PTAK-RFQ. The PTAK-RFQ module 0 was first subjected to vacuum tests and then to detailed vacuum leak tests. Subsequently, low-power rf measurements were performed for tuning of field and frequency. The tuning algorithm developed by CERN was optimized for 16 tuners and 6 test field points to be adjusted to the PTAK-RFQ module 0 to the desired field distribution. The tuning algorithm is based on a response matrix, whose inputs are created by bead-pull measurements of individual tuner movements. The tuning algorithm gives some predictions for corrective tuner movements to achieve desired field distribution. In the framework of all these RF tuning processes, the field distribution was tuned through the tuning algorithm and then the frequency was tuned manually.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Ion source and LEBT of KAHVELab proton beamline
Authors:
A. Adıgüzel,
S. Açıksöz,
A. Çağlar,
H. Çetinkaya,
Ş. Esen,
D. Halis,
A. Hamparsunoğlu,
T. B. İlhan,
A. Kılıçgedik,
O. Koçer,
S. Oğur,
S. Öz,
A. Özbey,
V. E. Özcan,
N. G. Ünel
Abstract:
The KAHVE Laboratory, at Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey is home to an educational proton linac project. The proton beam will originate from a 20 keV H+ source and will be delivered to a two module Radio Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) operating at 800 MHz via a low energy beam transport (LEBT) line. Currently, the design phase being over, commissioning and stability tests are ongoing for the pro…
▽ More
The KAHVE Laboratory, at Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey is home to an educational proton linac project. The proton beam will originate from a 20 keV H+ source and will be delivered to a two module Radio Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) operating at 800 MHz via a low energy beam transport (LEBT) line. Currently, the design phase being over, commissioning and stability tests are ongoing for the proton beamline which is already produced and installed except the RFQ which is being manufactured. This work summarizes the design, production and test phases of the ion source and LEBT line components.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2022; v1 submitted 31 July, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Visual GUI testing in practice: An extended industrial case study
Authors:
Vahid Garousi,
Wasif Afzal,
Adem Çağlar,
İhsan Berk Işık,
Berker Baydan,
Seçkin Çaylak,
Ahmet Zeki Boyraz,
Burak Yolaçan,
Kadir Herkiloğlu
Abstract:
Context: Visual GUI testing (VGT) is referred to as the latest generation GUI-based testing. It is a tool-driven technique, which uses image recognition for interacting with and asserting the behavior of the system under test. Motivated by the industrial need of a large Turkish software and systems company providing solutions in the areas of defense and IT sector, an action-research project was re…
▽ More
Context: Visual GUI testing (VGT) is referred to as the latest generation GUI-based testing. It is a tool-driven technique, which uses image recognition for interacting with and asserting the behavior of the system under test. Motivated by the industrial need of a large Turkish software and systems company providing solutions in the areas of defense and IT sector, an action-research project was recently initiated to implement VGT in several teams and projects in the company.
Objective: To address the above needs, we planned and carried out an empirical investigation with the goal of assessing VGT using two tools (Sikuli and JAutomate). The purpose was to determine a suitable approach and tool for VGT of a given project (software product) in the company, increase the know-how in the company's test teams.
Method: Using an action-research case-study design, we investigated the use of VGT in the studied organization. Specifically, using the two selected VGT tools, we conducted a quantitative and a qualitative evaluation of VGT.
Results: By assessing the list of Challenges, Problems and Limitations (CPL), proposed in previous work, in the context of our empirical study, we found that test-tool- and SUT-related CPLs were quite comparable to a previous empirical study, e.g., the synchronization between SUT and test tools were not always robust and there were failures in test tools' image recognition features. When assessing the types of test maintenance activities, when executing the automated test cases on next versions of the SUTs, for the case of the two test tools, we found that about half of the test cases (59.1% and 47.8%) failed in the next version.
Conclusion: By our results, we confirm some of the previously-reported issues when conducting VGT. Further, we highlight some additional challenges in test maintenance when using VGT.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2020; v1 submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
