Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2410.23440

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2410.23440 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Oct 2024 (v1), last revised 26 Jun 2025 (this version, v3)]

Title:The Sample Complexity of Learning Lipschitz Operators with respect to Gaussian Measures

Authors:Ben Adcock, Michael Griebel, Gregor Maier
View a PDF of the paper titled The Sample Complexity of Learning Lipschitz Operators with respect to Gaussian Measures, by Ben Adcock and Michael Griebel and Gregor Maier
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Operator learning, the approximation of mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces using machine learning, has gained increasing research attention in recent years. Approximate operators, learned from data, can serve as efficient surrogate models for problems in computational science and engineering, complementing traditional methods. However, despite their empirical success, our understanding of the underlying mathematical theory is in large part still incomplete. In this paper, we study the approximation of Lipschitz operators with respect to Gaussian measures. We prove higher Gaussian Sobolev regularity of Lipschitz operators and establish lower and upper bounds on the Hermite polynomial approximation error. We then study general reconstruction strategies of Lipschitz operators from $m$ arbitrary (potentially adaptive) linear samples. As a key finding, we tightly characterize the corresponding sample complexity, that is, the smallest achievable worst-case error among all possible choices of (adaptive) sampling and reconstruction strategies in terms of $m$. As a consequence, we identify an inherent curse of sample complexity: No method to approximate Lipschitz operators based on $m$ linear samples can achieve algebraic convergence rates in $m$. On the positive side, we prove that a sufficiently fast spectral decay of the covariance operator of the underlying Gaussian measure guarantees convergence rates which are arbitrarily close to any algebraic rate. Overall, by tightly characterizing the sample complexity, our work confirms the intrinsic difficulty of learning Lipschitz operators, regardless of the data or learning technique.
Comments: Section 6 about pointwise sampling in v2 of this paper has been cut and will appear elsewhere
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
Cite as: arXiv:2410.23440 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2410.23440v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.23440
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gregor Maier [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:32:30 UTC (81 KB)
[v2] Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:07:33 UTC (82 KB)
[v3] Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:15:09 UTC (70 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Sample Complexity of Learning Lipschitz Operators with respect to Gaussian Measures, by Ben Adcock and Michael Griebel and Gregor Maier
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.NA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
math
math.NA

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack