Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2312.06544

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

arXiv:2312.06544 (cs)
[Submitted on 11 Dec 2023]

Title:Complexity Evaluation of Parallel Execution of the RAPiD Deep-Learning Algorithm on Intel CPU

Authors:Dominic Konrad, Zhihao Duan, Mertcan Cokbas, Prakash Ishwar
View a PDF of the paper titled Complexity Evaluation of Parallel Execution of the RAPiD Deep-Learning Algorithm on Intel CPU, by Dominic Konrad and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Knowing how many and where are people in various indoor spaces is critical for reducing HVAC energy waste, space management, spatial analytics and in emergency scenarios. While a range of technologies have been proposed to detect and track people in large indoor spaces, ceiling-mounted fisheye cameras have recently emerged as strong contenders. Currently, RAPiD is the SOTA algorithm for people detection in images captured by fisheye cameras. However, in large spaces several overhead fisheye cameras are needed to assure high accuracy of counting and thus multiple instances of RAPiD must be executed simultaneously. This report evaluates inference time when multiple instances of RAPiD run in parallel on an Ubuntu NUC PC with Intel I7 8559U CPU. We consider three mechanisms of CPU-resource allocation to handle multiple instances of RAPiD: 1) managed by Ubuntu, 2) managed by user via operating-system calls to assign logical cores, and 3) managed by user via PyTorch-library calls to limit the number of threads used by PyTorch. Each scenario was evaluated on 300 images. The experimental results show, that when one or two instances of RAPiD are executed in parallel all three approaches result in similar inference times of 1.8sec and 3.2sec, respectively. However, when three or more instances of RAPiD run in parallel, limiting the number of threads used by PyTorch results in the shortest inference times. On average, RAPiD completes inference of 2 images simultaneously in about 3sec, 4 images in 6sec and 8 images in less than 14sec. This is important for real-time system design. In HVAC-application scenarios, with a typical reaction time of 10-15min, a latency of 14sec is negligible so a single 8559U CPU can support 8 camera streams thus reducing the system cost. However, in emergency scenarios, when time is of essence, a single CPU may be needed for each camera to reduce the latency to 1.8sec.
Subjects: Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Performance (cs.PF)
Report number: ECE-2022-04
Cite as: arXiv:2312.06544 [cs.DC]
  (or arXiv:2312.06544v1 [cs.DC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06544
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Mertcan Cokbas [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:27:19 UTC (8,486 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Complexity Evaluation of Parallel Execution of the RAPiD Deep-Learning Algorithm on Intel CPU, by Dominic Konrad and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.PF
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack