Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2311.10440

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:2311.10440 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Nov 2023]

Title:Parallel Verification of Natural Deduction Proof Graphs

Authors:James T. Oswald (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), Brandon Rozek (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
View a PDF of the paper titled Parallel Verification of Natural Deduction Proof Graphs, by James T. Oswald (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Graph-based interactive theorem provers offer a visual representation of proofs, explicitly representing the dependencies and inferences between each of the proof steps in a graph or hypergraph format. The number and complexity of these dependency links can determine how long it takes to verify the validity of the entire proof. Towards this end, we present a set of parallel algorithms for the formal verification of graph-based natural-deduction (ND) style proofs. We introduce a definition of layering that captures dependencies between the proof steps (nodes). Nodes in each layer can then be verified in parallel as long as prior layers have been verified. To evaluate the performance of our algorithms on proof graphs, we propose a framework for finding the performance bounds and patterns using directed acyclic network topologies (DANTs). This framework allows us to create concrete instances of DANTs for empirical evaluation of our algorithms. With this, we compare our set of parallel algorithms against a serial implementation with two experiments: one scaling both the problem size and the other scaling the number of threads. Our findings show that parallelization results in improved verification performance for certain DANT instances. We also show that our algorithms scale for certain DANT instances with respect to the number of threads.
Comments: In Proceedings LFMTP 2023, arXiv:2311.09918
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)
Cite as: arXiv:2311.10440 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:2311.10440v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.10440
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: EPTCS 396, 2023, pp. 36-51
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.396.4
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: EPTCS [view email] [via EPTCS proxy]
[v1] Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:33:23 UTC (830 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Parallel Verification of Natural Deduction Proof Graphs, by James T. Oswald (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.DC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LO

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack