Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2208.11642

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computational Complexity

arXiv:2208.11642 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Aug 2022 (v1), last revised 9 Nov 2023 (this version, v4)]

Title:On the existence of strong proof complexity generators

Authors:Jan Krajicek
View a PDF of the paper titled On the existence of strong proof complexity generators, by Jan Krajicek
View PDF
Abstract:Cook and Reckhow 1979 pointed out that NP is not closed under complementation iff there is no propositional proof system that admits polynomial size proofs of all tautologies. Theory of proof complexity generators aims at constructing sets of tautologies hard for strong and possibly for all proof systems. We focus at a conjecture from K.2004 in foundations of the theory that there is a proof complexity generator hard for all proof systems. This can be equivalently formulated (for p-time generators) without a reference to proof complexity notions as follows:
* There exist a p-time function $g$ stretching each input by one bit such that its range intersects all infinite NP sets.
We consider several facets of this conjecture, including its links to bounded arithmetic (witnessing and independence results), to time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity, to feasible disjunction property of propositional proof systems and to complexity of proof search. We argue that a specific gadget generator from K.2009 is a good candidate for $g$. We define a new hardness property of generators, the $\bigvee$-hardness, and shows that one specific gadget generator is the $\bigvee$-hardest (w.r.t. any sufficiently strong proof system). We define the class of feasibly infinite NP sets and show, assuming a hypothesis from circuit complexity, that the conjecture holds for all feasibly infinite NP sets.
Comments: preliminary version August 2022, revised July 2023 and November 2023
Subjects: Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Logic (math.LO)
MSC classes: 03F20, 68Q11
ACM classes: F.1.1; F.4.1
Cite as: arXiv:2208.11642 [cs.CC]
  (or arXiv:2208.11642v4 [cs.CC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.11642
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Bulletin of Symbolic Logic , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2024 , pp. 20 - 40
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2023.40
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jan Krajicek [view email]
[v1] Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:30:44 UTC (16 KB)
[v2] Wed, 1 Feb 2023 08:58:04 UTC (17 KB)
[v3] Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:18:53 UTC (22 KB)
[v4] Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:10:57 UTC (22 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On the existence of strong proof complexity generators, by Jan Krajicek
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
math.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CC
cs.LO
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack