Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2011.07542

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Sound

arXiv:2011.07542 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Nov 2020 (v1), last revised 2 Jun 2021 (this version, v3)]

Title:Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech

Authors:I. Kodrasi, M. Pernon, M. Laganaro, H. Bourlard
View a PDF of the paper titled Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech, by I. Kodrasi and M. Pernon and M. Laganaro and H. Bourlard
View PDF
Abstract:Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assessment of clinicians, the automatic and perceptual classification accuracy has never been compared. In this paper, we investigate a three-class automatic technique and a set of handcrafted features for the discrimination of dysarthria, AoS and neurotypical speech. Instead of following the commonly used One-versus-One or One-versus-Rest approaches for multi-class classification, a hierarchical approach is proposed. Further, a perceptual study is conducted where speech and language pathologists are asked to listen to recordings of dysarthria, AoS, and neurotypical speech and decide which class the recordings belong to. The proposed automatic technique is evaluated on the same recordings and the automatic and perceptual classification performance are compared. The presented results show that the hierarchical classification approach yields a higher classification accuracy than baseline One-versus-One and One-versus-Rest approaches. Further, the presented results show that the automatic approach yields a higher classification accuracy than the perceptual assessment of speech and language pathologists, demonstrating the potential advantages of integrating automatic tools in clinical practice.
Comments: ICASSP 2021
Subjects: Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
Cite as: arXiv:2011.07542 [cs.SD]
  (or arXiv:2011.07542v3 [cs.SD] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.07542
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ina Kodrasi [view email]
[v1] Sun, 15 Nov 2020 14:48:28 UTC (76 KB)
[v2] Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:16:22 UTC (76 KB)
[v3] Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:36:58 UTC (79 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech, by I. Kodrasi and M. Pernon and M. Laganaro and H. Bourlard
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
eess
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SD
eess.AS

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Hervé Bourlard
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack