Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:2004.02837

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:2004.02837 (math)
[Submitted on 6 Apr 2020 (v1), last revised 2 Jul 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Near-linear convergence of the Random Osborne algorithm for Matrix Balancing

Authors:Jason M. Altschuler, Pablo A. Parrilo
View a PDF of the paper titled Near-linear convergence of the Random Osborne algorithm for Matrix Balancing, by Jason M. Altschuler and Pablo A. Parrilo
View PDF
Abstract:We revisit Matrix Balancing, a pre-conditioning task used ubiquitously for computing eigenvalues and matrix exponentials. Since 1960, Osborne's algorithm has been the practitioners' algorithm of choice and is now implemented in most numerical software packages. However, its theoretical properties are not well understood. Here, we show that a simple random variant of Osborne's algorithm converges in near-linear time in the input sparsity. Specifically, it balances $K\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^{n\times n}$ after $O(m\epsilon^{-2}\log\kappa)$ arithmetic operations, where $m$ is the number of nonzeros in $K$, $\epsilon$ is the $\ell_1$ accuracy, and $\kappa=\sum_{ij}K_{ij}/(\min_{ij:K_{ij}\neq 0}K_{ij})$ measures the conditioning of $K$. Previous work had established near-linear runtimes either only for $\ell_2$ accuracy (a weaker criterion which is less relevant for applications), or through an entirely different algorithm based on (currently) impractical Laplacian solvers.
We further show that if the graph with adjacency matrix $K$ is moderately connected--e.g., if $K$ has at least one positive row/column pair--then Osborne's algorithm initially converges exponentially fast, yielding an improved runtime $O(m\epsilon^{-1}\log\kappa)$. We also address numerical precision by showing that these runtime bounds still hold when using $O(\log(n\kappa/\epsilon))$-bit numbers.
Our results are established through an intuitive potential argument that leverages a convex optimization perspective of Osborne's algorithm, and relates the per-iteration progress to the current imbalance as measured in Hellinger distance. Unlike previous analyses, we critically exploit log-convexity of the potential. Our analysis extends to other variants of Osborne's algorithm: along the way, we establish significantly improved runtime bounds for cyclic, greedy, and parallelized variants.
Comments: v2: Fixed minor typos. Modified title for clarity. Corrected statement of Thm 6.1; this does not affect our main results
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
Cite as: arXiv:2004.02837 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2004.02837v2 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.02837
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jason Altschuler [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:31:58 UTC (57 KB)
[v2] Fri, 2 Jul 2021 22:49:52 UTC (37 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Near-linear convergence of the Random Osborne algorithm for Matrix Balancing, by Jason M. Altschuler and Pablo A. Parrilo
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.NA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DS
math
math.NA
math.OC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack