close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1710.01569

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1710.01569 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 4 Oct 2017 (v1), last revised 5 Feb 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: IV. Testing ASpiX with template-based cosmological simulations

Authors:A. Valotti, M. Pierre, A. Farahi, A. Evrard, L. Faccioli, J.-L. Sauvageot, N. Clerc, F. Pacaud
View a PDF of the paper titled The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: IV. Testing ASpiX with template-based cosmological simulations, by A. Valotti and 7 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Following extensive tests on analytical toy-catalogues (paper III), we present the results of a more realistic study over a 711 deg2 template-based cosmological simulation. Dark matter halos from the Aardvark simulation have been ascribed luminosities, temperatures and core-radii, using local scaling relations and assuming self-similar evolution. Predicted X-ray sky-maps are converted into XMM event lists using an instrumental simulator. The XXL pipeline run on the resulting sky images, produces an 'observed' cluster catalogue over which the tests have been performed. This allowed us to investigate the relative power of various combinations of count-rate, hardness-ratio, apparent-size and redshift information. Two fitting methods were used : a traditional MCMC approach and a simple minimisation procedure (Amoeba) whose mean uncertainties are a posteriori evaluated by means of synthetic catalogues. Results were analysed and compared to the predictions from a Fisher analysis (FA). For this particular catalogue realisation, assuming perfectly known scaling relations, the CR-HR combination gives $\sigma_8$ and $\Omega_m$ at the 10% level, while CR-HR-r$_c$-z improves this to $\leq$ 3%. Adding a second hardness ratio improves results from the CR-HR1-r$_c$ combination, but to a lesser extent than adding redshift information. When all coefficients of the M-T relation (including scatter) are also fitted, cosmological parameters are constrained to within 5-10%, and larger for the M-T coefficients (up to a factor of two for the scatter). Errors returned by the MCMC, by Amoeba, and by FA predictions, are in most cases in excellent agreement and always within a factor of two. We also study the impact of the scatter of the M-Rc relation on the number of detected clusters: for the cluster typical sizes usually assumed, the larger the scatter, the lower the number of detected objects.
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1710.01569 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1710.01569v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.01569
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 614, A72 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731445
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Marguerite Pierre [view email]
[v1] Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:26:16 UTC (3,861 KB)
[v2] Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:37:51 UTC (3,861 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: IV. Testing ASpiX with template-based cosmological simulations, by A. Valotti and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-10
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack