Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1701.02952v2

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1701.02952v2 (cs)
[Submitted on 11 Jan 2017 (v1), revised 12 Jan 2017 (this version, v2), latest version 10 Feb 2017 (v3)]

Title:Unhappy Developers: Bad for Themselves, Bad for Process, and Bad for Software Product

Authors:Daniel Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang, Pekka Abrahamsson
View a PDF of the paper titled Unhappy Developers: Bad for Themselves, Bad for Process, and Bad for Software Product, by Daniel Graziotin and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Recent research in software engineering supports the "happy-productive" thesis, and the desire of flourishing happiness among programmers is often expressed by industry practitioners. Recent literature has suggested that a cost-effective way to foster happiness and productivity among workers could be to limit unhappiness of developers due to its negative impact. However, possible negative effects of unhappiness are still largely unknown in the software development context. In this paper, we present the first results from a study exploring the consequences of the unhappy developers. Using qualitative data analysis of the survey responses given by 181 participants, we identified 49 potential consequences of unhappiness while developing software. These results have several implications. While raising the awareness of the role of moods, emotions and feelings in software development, we foresee that our classification scheme will spawn new happiness studies linking causes and effects, and it can act as a guideline for developers and managers to foster happiness at work.
Comments: 3 pages. To appear as a poster paper in the Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '17)
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:1701.02952 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1701.02952v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.02952
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Daniel Graziotin [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:38:13 UTC (60 KB)
[v2] Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:35:29 UTC (60 KB)
[v3] Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:57:34 UTC (60 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Unhappy Developers: Bad for Themselves, Bad for Process, and Bad for Software Product, by Daniel Graziotin and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Daniel Graziotin
Fabian Fagerholm
Xiaofeng Wang
Pekka Abrahamsson
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack