Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1612.07122

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Theory

arXiv:1612.07122 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Nov 2016 (v1), last revised 30 May 2018 (this version, v3)]

Title:Performance of group testing algorithms with near-constant tests-per-item

Authors:Oliver Johnson, Matthew Aldridge, Jonathan Scarlett
View a PDF of the paper titled Performance of group testing algorithms with near-constant tests-per-item, by Oliver Johnson and Matthew Aldridge and Jonathan Scarlett
View PDF
Abstract:We consider the nonadaptive group testing with N items, of which $K = \Theta(N^\theta)$ are defective. We study a test design in which each item appears in nearly the same number of tests. For each item, we independently pick L tests uniformly at random with replacement, and place the item in those tests. We analyse the performance of these designs with simple and practical decoding algorithms in a range of sparsity regimes, and show that the performance is consistently improved in comparison with standard Bernoulli designs. We show that our new design requires 23% fewer tests than a Bernoulli design when paired with the simple decoding algorithms known as COMP and DD. This gives the best known nonadaptive group testing performance for $\theta > 0.43$, and the best proven performance with a practical decoding algorithm for all $\theta \in (0,1)$. We also give a converse result showing that the DD algorithm is optimal for these designs when $\theta > 1/2$.
Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures. This work was presented in part at the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory: arXiv:1602.03471
Subjects: Information Theory (cs.IT); Probability (math.PR)
Cite as: arXiv:1612.07122 [cs.IT]
  (or arXiv:1612.07122v3 [cs.IT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.07122
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2018
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2018.2861772
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Matthew Aldridge [view email]
[v1] Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:48:27 UTC (685 KB)
[v2] Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:24:59 UTC (554 KB)
[v3] Wed, 30 May 2018 16:01:55 UTC (499 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Performance of group testing algorithms with near-constant tests-per-item, by Oliver Johnson and Matthew Aldridge and Jonathan Scarlett
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.IT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.IT
math
math.PR

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Oliver Johnson
Matthew Aldridge
Jonathan Scarlett
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack