Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:1509.03048

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Logic

arXiv:1509.03048 (math)
[Submitted on 10 Sep 2015]

Title:Consistency of circuit evaluation, extended resolution and total NP search problems

Authors:Jan Krajicek
View a PDF of the paper titled Consistency of circuit evaluation, extended resolution and total NP search problems, by Jan Krajicek
View PDF
Abstract:We consider sets $\Gamma(n,s,k)$ of narrow clauses expressing that no definition of a size $s$ circuit with $n$ inputs is refutable in resolution R in $k$ steps. We show that every CNF shortly refutable in Extended R, ER, can be easily reduced to an instance of $\Gamma(0,s,k)$ (with $s,k$ depending on the size of the ER-refutation) and, in particular, that $\Gamma(0,s,k)$ when interpreted as a relativized NP search problem is complete among all such problems provably total in bounded arithmetic theory $V^1_1$.
We use the ideas of implicit proofs to define from $\Gamma(0,s,k)$ a non-relativized NP search problem $i\Gamma$ and we show that it is complete among all such problems provably total in bounded arithmetic theory $V^1_2$. The reductions are definable in $S^1_2$.
We indicate how similar results can be proved for some other propositional proof systems and bounded arithmetic theories and how the construction can be used to define specific random unsatisfiable formulas, and we formulate two open problems about them.
Comments: Preliminary version this http URL 2015
Subjects: Logic (math.LO); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
MSC classes: 03F20 (Primary), 68Q15 (Secondary)
Cite as: arXiv:1509.03048 [math.LO]
  (or arXiv:1509.03048v1 [math.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.03048
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Forum of Mathematics, Sigma / Volume 4 / 2016, e15
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2016.13
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jan Krajicek [view email]
[v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:49:05 UTC (12 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Consistency of circuit evaluation, extended resolution and total NP search problems, by Jan Krajicek
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LO
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack