Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
[Submitted on 26 May 2015 (this version), latest version 7 Nov 2015 (v2)]
Title:Quasi-normal modes of Pop III binary black holes can confirm or refute the Einstein theory in the strong gravity region
View PDFAbstract:Using our population synthesis code, we found that the typical chirp mass defined by $(m_1m_2)^{3/5}/(m_1+m_2)^{1/5}$ of Pop III binary black holes (BH-BHs) is $\sim30~\rm M_{\odot}$ with the total mass of $\sim60~\rm M_{\odot}$ so that the inspiral chirp signal as well as quasi normal mode (QNM) of the merged black hole (BH) are interesting targets of KAGRA, Adv. LIGO, Adv. Virgo and GEO network. The detection rate of the coalescing Pop III BH-BHs is 262 $\rm events~yr^{-1}$$(\rm SFR_P/(10^{-2.5}~\rm M_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}~Mpc^{-3}))\cdot Err_{sys}$ in our standard model where $\rm SFR_{p}$ and $\rm Err_{sys}$ are the peak value of the Pop III star formation rate and the systematic error with $\rm Err_{sys}=1$ for our standard model, respectively. To evaluate the robustness of chirp mass distribution and the range of $\rm Err_{sys}$, we examine the dependence of the results on the unknown parameters and the distribution functions in the population synthesis code. We found that the chirp mass has a peak at $\sim 30 ~\rm M_{\odot}$ in most of parameters and distribution functions as well as $\rm Err_{sys}$ ranges from 0.05577 to 2.289. Therefore, the detection rate of the coalescing Pop III BH-BHs ranges $14.6-599.3\ {\rm events~yr^{-1} ~(SFR_p/(10^{-2.5}~M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}~Mpc^{-3}))}$. The minimum rate corresponds to the worst model which we think unlikely so that unless $ {\rm ~(SFR_p/(10^{-2.5}~M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}~Mpc^{-3})) \ll 0.1}$, we expect the Pop III BH-BHs merger rate of at least one event per year by KAGRA, Adv. LIGO, Adv. Virgo and GEO network. Since the expected frequency of the QNM of the merged BH of mass $\sim60~\rm M_{\odot}$ is $\sim 200~{\rm Hz}$ where the interferometers have good sensitivity, there is a good chance to check if the Einstein theory is correct or not in the strong gravity region.
Submission history
From: Tomoya Kinugawa [view email][v1] Tue, 26 May 2015 14:26:37 UTC (282 KB)
[v2] Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:51:04 UTC (115 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.